Information security management process (ISMP) is a fundamental component of any robust information security management system (ISMS). As information security risks are continually evolving, the need for a systematic, repeatable, and consistent risk management process is critical for every organization.
The risk management process is not a one-time activity, but rather a continuous cycle that involves identifying, assessing, and managing risks that could potentially impact the organization’s information assets and operations. It spans several key stages, including context establishment, risk assessment, risk treatment, risk acceptance, and communication and consultation.
The ultimate goal of this process is to enable the organization to adequately manage potential threats and vulnerabilities, ensuring that risks are kept within acceptable levels. By understanding and applying the risk management process, we can make informed decisions about the allocation of resources, implementation of controls, and overall management of information security risk.
Risk management diagram.
There are various activities that ISMP should include:
- Determine the Scope of the Risk Assessment
- Threat and Vulnerability Identification
- Analyze Risks and Determine Potential Impact
- Prioritize Risks
- Document All Risks
Establish context:
- Risk management approach. Establish approach specific for organization.
- Risk evaluation criteria. Propose and evaluate risk management criteria.
- Risk acceptance criteria. Discuss acceptance criteria.
- Scope and boundaries. Establish baseline and assessment scope.
Risk identification:
- Identification of assets. Identify and classify critical assets within an organization.
- Identification of threats. Threats can be internal or external, malicious or accidental.
- Identification of existing control. Identify existed solution together with stakeholders.
- Identification of vulnerabilities. Identify and understand weaknesses in your system, underlying infrastructure, support systems, and major applications.
- Identification of consequences. Understand the results if appropriate security solution would not be in place.
Risk analysis:
- Assessment of consequences. Based on identification, address the best way to avoid/mitigate or accept consequences.
- Assessment of likelihood. Use matrix approach to classify risk likelihood.
- Determination of risk level. Establish qualitative and quantitative correlation between risk level and risk likelihood.
Risk treatment:
- Risk mitigation. A strategy that seeks to minimize the risk to an acceptable level.
- Risk avoidance. A strategy that requires stopping the activity that has risk or choosing a less risky alternative.
- Risk transfer. A strategy that passes the risk to a third party.
- Risk acceptance. A strategy that seeks to accept the current level of risk and the costs associated with it if the risk were realized.
Risk assessment process.
Risk assessment process, a crucial component of risk management that involves the systematic identification, analysis, and evaluation of risks that could potentially impact the organization’s information assets and operations.
Risk identification:
- Identify Assets. Begin by identifying and documenting all assets that fall within the defined scope of the ISMS.
- Identify Threats. For each identified asset, document all potential threats. These could be human (like errors or fraud), natural (like fire or flood), or environmental (like power failure).
- Identify Existing Controls. For each threat, identify and document the existing controls in place designed to prevent or mitigate these threats.
- Identify Vulnerabilities. Document all vulnerabilities in the existing controls that could be exploited by these threats. This could include weak passwords, outdated software, or inadequate physical security.
Risk analysis:
- Determine Likelihood. For each threat-vulnerability pair, estimate the likelihood of the threat exploiting the vulnerability, using the predefined scale.
- Determine Impact. For each threat-vulnerability pair, estimate the potential impact if the threat were to exploit the vulnerability, using the predefined scale.
- Calculate Risk Levels. Multiply the likelihood and impact for each threat-vulnerability pair to calculate the risk level.
Risk evaluation:
After risks have been identified and analyzed, they should be compared against the organization’s predefined risk acceptance criteria. This involves the following steps:
- List Analyzed Risks. Start with a list of all identified and analyzed risks, along with their calculated risk scores.
- Apply Risk Acceptance Criteria. For each risk, compare its risk score with the predefined risk acceptance thresholds for Low, Medium, High, and Very High risks.
- Categorize Risks. Based on the comparison, categorize each risk into one of the four categories (Low, Medium, High, Very High). Risks that are within the organizations risk acceptance criteria can be accepted and do not require further treatment. Risks that are not within them, need to undergo the following steps.
Once the risks are categorized, they need to be prioritized to decide which risks should be addressed first:
- Rank risks. Within each category, rank the risks based on their risk scores. Higher risk scores should be given higher priority.
- Document prioritized risks. Document the prioritized list of risks, along with their categories and risk scores. This list will serve as a guide for the risk treatment process.
For more information please go to our incident management section, follow me on Twitter and LinkedIn, subscribe to our newsletter to be in touch.
Save your privacy, be ethical!